Saturday, August 29 2026

Questo articolo è disponibile anche in: Italian Spanish

Anyone who enjoys romantic fiction is almost certainly familiar with Nicholas Sparks, one of the most renowned romance authors in the United States and internationally. His novels, translated throughout much of the world, usually revolve around a man and a woman who meet in unexpected or mysterious ways. Swept up by an overwhelming attraction and wrapped in a love portrayed as pure, they come to believe they are destined for one another.

The specific plot may change from book to book, but the theme is often similar.

Take, for example, A Walk to Remember (1999). In that novel, the best student in her high school class – a quiet girl devoted to home and church, mocked by classmates for her purity – transforms the heart of a rebellious young man who once ridiculed her alongside his peers. The story is about a redeeming love that goes beyond the shadow of death.

Now, I’d like to draw our attention to a more recent book from this author: The Best of Me (2010), a novel that can still be found on bookshelves and is quite popular with readers.

The story is about two very different people. He is a successful journalist from New York City; she is a librarian in a small town where everyone knows one another.

He is confident and self-assured; she is reserved and cautious.
He is sociable, constantly traveling, and accustomed to the dazzling lights of the city; she prefers nature, calm routine, and authentic relationships.

He arrives in her small town because, as a journalist, he’s sent to investigate a mysterious event. At first, their worlds seem too distant ever to meet – and yet, the unexpected happens. Their attraction proves irresistible. As the story unfolds, the reader comes to believe that the two were somehow meant for each other – even though everything appears to stand in the way of a shared future.

Ugo Borghello would describe this as the classic example of “conflicted romantic love,” a narrative pattern in which obstacles only intensify the desire to be together and to overcome every barrier.

I do not want to reveal the entire plot, the twists, or the ending. Instead, I would like to reflect on several elements that make the book engaging and the love story appealing – yet which ultimately have little connection with real life. Reading the novel, one might begin to wish for “a love like this.” The problem is that such love cannot be built in the way the book suggests.

The story encourages us to believe that a man could be ready to give his life for a woman after knowing her for only two days. While the narrative does capture something beautiful – the dream of a love capable of self-giving and attentive to the uniqueness of the other – it overlooks a crucial truth: in real life, such love cannot develop without deep mutual knowledge or without emotional maturity. The protagonist is a divorced man who, for years, has taken relationships with women lightly. Then he meets her – “the right one” – the woman who instantly sweeps away years of self-centered living.

The story undoubtedly strikes sensitive chords in the female heart. Many women long to be seen as unique – capable of inspiring transformation. Yet in real life, this kind of change does not happen without serious personal work, nor does it occur overnight. Even when something like this appears at the beginning of a relationship, it rarely represents lasting change; more often it reflects a passing infatuation.

Some readers might claim that this book is just a fairy tale – that a novel is not meant to be a guide for relationships. Even so, the message a story communicates is not irrelevant. In this book, after only two days together, the protagonists give themselves completely to each other physically. The author frames this moment as if their love had already reached the maturity of a relationship between spouses.

This is not a fairy tale. It’s a lie.

The novel certainly deserves credit for inspiring dreams of a love that seeks total self-giving. It also highlights the transformative power of love and trust. Yet – without attributing any ill intention to the author – it misleads readers about the path that leads to such love.

One essential point is this: love does not arise from physical intimacy. Rather, it grows out of – and is nourished by – the intimacy of two hearts.

If passion is genuine, it does not resemble a fire pit that suddenly bursts into flame without restraint. The book suggests that passion cannot be governed or restrained, that it reveals the “truth” about a relationship. In reality, passion is more like a fragile flame. It must be protected carefully because it can easily be extinguished or get out of control when the wind changes direction.

Instead of igniting the fire “regardless of everything else” – especially regardless of the past or the future – it is wiser to build safeguards that protect the relationship.

Healthy love is built on a foundation that does not ignore the past but integrates it, with a goal that gives direction to the future. These elements support a love that does not deny passion but brings it into harmony with the rest of life.

The gift of one’s body, moreover, is sincere only when two people have already given themselves to one another in the whole of life. The protagonists feel strong attraction and believe it is love, yet they still know very little about one another.

Without true sharing, there can be no communion.

The story draws the reader in. Nicholas Sparks undeniably knows how to craft vivid scenes and compelling images – and how to make us dream. Yet we should not take everything he writes about as reality. A genuine “we” requires time and a solid foundation. Without these two elements, what appears to be love is nothing more than a beautiful, dazzling, captivating illusion.

Previous

10 tips to avoid using a tablet in restaurants

Next

Artificial intimacy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also