Tuesday, June 25 2024

Flexibility, specialized skills, “smart working” and goal orientation could
really decide women’s success in the digital environment. But is it really
like that? In reality, the OECD data (Organization for Economic Cooperation
and Development) offers a more precise picture of the opportunities and
risks concerning women and the new forms of jobs in the the GIG Economy.

Although the change taking place is enormous, professionals who respond
adequately to the job listing are quite few.

In addition, the World Economic Forum’s The Future of Jobs and Skills Report highlighted that

65% of children that are just now starting their schooling will have
jobs that currently do not exist.

Given the scale of the change we are experiencing, it is important to start
thinking straight away about the opportunities and risks that this will
imply for women and overall female employment.

The OECD data provides a picture of the coming future

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development has dealt with
the issue jobs and women in its report Going digital: the future of work for women. The analysis seeks to
investigate whether digital transformation will strengthen or weaken the
position of women in the labor market.

One major aspect has to do with flexibility. Women,
despite having been emancipated, continue to take care of the home and
family in their free time outside of work, which is why flexibility seems
to be one of women’s greatest skills, as it is confirmed by the OECD data: women
who work from home also have higher employment rates among mothers. And,
where the organization of work is more flexible, a reduction in the pay gap
with males has also been noted.

According to the OECD, the battle of flexible work plays with three
fundamental variables:

• The voluntary nature of the adoption of these measures;

• Greater or lesser autonomy in the organization of work;

• Workplace safety.

But is flexibility really the number one skill of women? No,
because if it is true that this makes it possible to reconcile domestic
activities, it is also true that, if poorly managed, it
can complicate the separation between private life and work, instead of
facilitating reconciliation.

Another key aspect is computerization
. The increasing automation will influence and determine the work life of
all categories, men and women, even if the forecasts are not catastrophic.
According to the institute’s estimates, 9% of jobs in OECD countries are at
high risk of computerization, while a further 25% could change
significantly as a percentage between 50% and 75% of their functions could
be automated.

The OECD continues to a rapid analysis of male and female employment in the
various sectors, combining it with the propensity of these same sectors to
work computerization and job loss, to conclude that there is no significant
difference.

The recipe for future work: skills

The true antidote to unemployment is represented by skills
. Even today it is difficult to find workers able to respond to changing
market needs.

Only 5% of workers in possession of a university degree run a high risk of
losing their jobs due to automation, which increases to 40% for workers
with a high school education degree. At first glance, it’s good news for
women, which in the OECD countries now make up the majority of graduates.

Two essential skills to hold onto a job:

• The soft skills or all those characteristics of the personality such as
individual qualities and attitudes, social skills, communication and
management;

• And specialist skills in ICT, related to the technological information
sector.

It is

precisely on the second skill that women must work to continue to be
competitive on the job market.

As noted by the OECD, in fact

, there is an important difference between males and females: which
holds 5.5% of men competent and women at only 1.4% competency.


What impact will digitalization have for female employment?

The OECD concludes its report by hinting at a series of policies that would
make the digital revolution an opportunity for women and not a risk:

• Resolve the gap between men and women in access and, above all, in the
use of new technologies;

• Promote flexible working methods using new technologies;

• Ensure that all workers, both men and women, have the same attention in
the implementation of policies in support of outsourced workers;

• Adapt social protection systems to new forms of work.

Most of these proposals do not require a large budget, but competence and
organization in the planning of public policies.

Home schooling: parental education

Among the

various forms of jobs that the world 4.0 offers is homeschooling,

which is a form of domestic education. Since it is not necessary to turn to
teachers or people with special requirements, it could be an excellent
opportunity for women who want to work from home, reconciling “freely,” her
work and private life. There are no particular obligations other than those
dictated by the State Legislation, which obliges the students to undergo
yearly examinations to assess progress and attest to the kids’ scholastic
progress.

In the USA, England and Canada it is a widespread
phenomenon
; and in France, Spain and Italy it is constantly growing, even if with a
few problems here and there.

Among the pros, there is the chance of having a teacher available with more
attention and consideration of the needs of the individual student. A 1-1
ratio teacher-students, less standardized rules and more flexible
evaluation criteria.

Among the cons, the reduction of socialization time and the isolation of
the student that would limit even more his or her relationships with their
peers. This, together with the time of exposure to smartphones and
computers could determine the inability to relate to the surrounding world
and group dynamics.

What is

certain is that for women it could be a good solution for having a job
at hand, at home, and reconciling domestic activities with the working
world.

Previous

Fake news and post-truth, a weary debate... maybe even worn out

Next

But are our children actually safe on the web? Minors and social media: the "almost" safeguard

Check Also